The Effect of the Jewett Orthosis on Pain and Orthosis Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Vertebroplasty or Kyphoplasty due to Multiple Myeloma-A Pilot Study

Authors

Keywords:

Kyphoplasty, Multiple Myeloma, Orthosis, Vertebroplasty

Abstract

Purpose: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy characterized by uncontrolled plasma cell proliferation, often resulting in bone fractures, particularly vertebral compression fractures. Standard treatment includes vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty to restore load distribution and stabilization. Postoperatively, the Jewett orthosis is prescribed to maintain spinal stability. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Jewett brace use on low back pain and patient satisfaction in MM patients who had undergone vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty.

Methods: Four male patients aged 30–45 years with MM and vertebral fractures treated with vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty were included. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) assessed back pain, and the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST) evaluated orthosis satisfaction. Vertebral curvature measurements were obtained one-month post-surgery to compare preoperative and postoperative vertebral height.

Results: According to the QBPDS, patients reported limitations in daily activities with a mean score of 49.25%. QUEST results showed that while the orthosis provided stabilization, the average satisfaction level was 3.85/5. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated an increase in vertebral height, from a preoperative mean of 1.92 cm to a postoperative mean of 2.25 cm.

Conclusion: Conservative treatment with postoperative Jewett orthosis contributed positively to vertebral stabilization. Patients experienced moderate back pain and improvements in daily living activities, and overall satisfaction with the orthosis was reported. Further studies with larger cohorts are recommended to clarify its impact on functional capacity and pain.

References

1. Osterhoff G, Kreinest M, Kuhnt T, Pohlenz C, Müller-Broich J, Röllig C, Teipel R, Scheyerer MJ, Schnake KJ, Spiegl UJA, Disch AC; Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU). Management of Pathological Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: Multidisciplinary Recommendations. Global Spine J. 2023 Apr;13(1_suppl):85S-93S. doi: 10.1177/21925682221143732. PMID: 37084345; PMCID: PMC10177308.

2. Zijlstra, H., Te Velde, J. P., Striano, B. M., Groot, O. Q., de Groot, T. M., Raje, N., Patel, C., Husseini, J., Delawi, D., Kempen, D. H. R., Verlaan, J. J., & Schwab, J. H. (2025). Remineralization Rate of Lytic Lesions of the Spine in Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy. Global spine journal, 15(3), 1712–1724. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241260651

3. Türk, Ç., & Ozdemir, N. (2024). Traumatic multiple-level continuous and noncontinuous thoracolumbar spinal fractures management in adult patients: A single-center experience. Yetişkin hastalarda travmatik çok seviyeli ardışık ve ardışık olmayan torakolomber spinal kırıkların yönetimi: Tek merkez deneyimi. Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 30(10), 745–753. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2024.57658

4. Wang, C., Li, X., Guo, Y., Du, W., Guo, H., & Chen, W. (2022). The Kinematic and Kinetic Responses of the Trunk and Lower Extremity Joints during Walking with and without the Spinal Orthosis. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(11), 6952. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116952

5. Zeng H-Z, Zheng L-D, Xu M-L, et al. Biomechanical effect of age-related structural changes on cervical intervertebral disc: A finite element study. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine. 2022;236(10):1541-1551. doi:10.1177/09544119221122007

6. Kiraz, İ., & Dağtekin, A. (2020). Osteoporotik vertebra kırıkları: Vertebroplasti / Kifoplasti - Avantajları / Dezavantajları [Vertebroplasty / Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebra Fractures - Advantages / Disadvantages]. Türk Nöroşirürji Dergisi, 30(3), 516–520

7. Fercho, J., Krakowiak, M., Yuser, R., Szmuda, T., Zieliński, P., Szarek, D., Pettersson, S. D., & Miękisiak, G. (2022). Evaluation of Movement Restriction of Spinal Orthoses Using Inertial Measurement Units. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(24), 16515. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416515

8. Kumar, A., & Jadav, V. (2023). Orthoses in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Management and Improving Quality of Life. IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.105427

9. Bicer, A., Yazici, A., Camdeviren, H., Milcan, A., & Erdogan, C. (2005). Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain: reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale and Pain Disability Index. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 18(1-2), 37-44.

10. Yakut Y, Yurt Y, Yagcı G, Sımsek E. Quebec Yardımcı Teknoloji Kullanıcı Memnuniyeti Değerlendirme 2.0 Anketi’nin protez ve ortez kullanan bireylerde Türkçe adaptasyonu. JETR. 2021;7(3):284-95.

11. Malçok, Ü. A., Şafak, Ö., Akman, T., & Aras, A. B. (2020). Kifoplasti ve vertebroplasti operasyonlarının klinik ve radyolojik olarak değerlendirilmesi. Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences, 10(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5505/kjms.2020.27676

12. Keshavarzi F, Arazpour M. Effect of spinal orthoses on osteoporotic elderly patients kyphosis, back muscles strength, balance and osteoporotic vertebral fractures: (A systematic review and meta-analysis). Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering. 2024;11. doi:10.1177/20556683241268605

13. Matussek, J., Boluki, D., Füssel, S. ve diğerleri. Osteoporoz ve osteoporotik vertebra kırıkları için ortez bakımı. Orthopäde 39 , 387–396 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-010-1596-2

14. de Sire A, Lippi L, Calafiore D, ve diğerleri. Dinamik spinal ortezlerin vertebral kırılganlık kırıkları nedeniyle sırt ağrısı çeken hastalarda kendi bildirdikleri etkiler: Çok merkezli prospektif kohort çalışması. Sırt ve Kas-iskelet Rehabilitasyonu Dergisi . 2023;37(4):929-941. doi: 10.3233/BMR-230177

15. Abe, T., Shibao, Y., Takeuchi, Y., Mataki, Y., Amano, K., Hioki, S., Miura, K., Noguchi, H., Funayama, T., Koda, M., & Yamazaki, M. (2018). Initial hospitalization with rigorous bed rest followed by bracing and rehabilitation as an option of conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral fractures in elderly patients: a pilot one arm safety

16. Taher, AW, Page, PS, Greeneway, GP, Ammanuel, S., Bunch, KM, Meisner, L., Hanna, A. ve Josiah, D. (2022). Ortez yoluyla konservatif olarak tedavi edilen yaygın idiyopatik iskelet hiperostozu ortamındaki omurga kırıkları: örnek vakalar. Nöroşirürji Dergisi: Vaka Dersleri , 3 (20), CASE21689. https://doi.org/10.3171/CASE21689

17. Yokoyama, K., Ikeda, N., Tanaka, H., Ito, Y., Sugie, A., Yamada, M., Wanibuchi, M., & Kawanishi, M. (2023). The Effectiveness of Vertebral Height Restoration Based on the Vertebroplasty Procedure Used to Treat Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures. Neurospine, 20(4), 1159–1165. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2346754.377

Downloads

Published

2025-08-31

How to Cite

Durmuş, A., Atılgan, E., Sevindik, Ömür G., & Algun, Z. C. (2025). The Effect of the Jewett Orthosis on Pain and Orthosis Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Vertebroplasty or Kyphoplasty due to Multiple Myeloma-A Pilot Study. Turkish Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics Science, 1(1), 37–46. Retrieved from https://turkishjpos.com/index.php/pub/article/view/11

Issue

Section

Articles